Executive search firms UK — editorial guide
Executive search firms UK: how they work, fees & the top firms
A plain-language editorial guide to the executive search industry for UK boards and founders.
Covering how retained search actually works, what the leading firms publish about themselves, the public picture on fees, and when a fractional or interim executive is the better answer than a six-figure search.
To hire a part-time leader directly, see our fractional recruitment agency.
AESC members: 16,000+ professionals, 70+ countries (2021 data) · Big Five
(SHREK) cover most FTSE 100 board work · fee is of the placed candidate's first-year
compensation · timeline is brief to offer accepted, longer for CEO/board.
Reviewed by Editorial Team · 27 May 2026.
01 · how the fee works
Retained, engaged, contingency.
Retained search is the standard model for C-suite and board appointments, paid upfront in three instalments — at engagement, at shortlist delivery, and at placement.
The retainer exists because the firm invests heavily in research and assessment before any candidate signs an offer, and because the search must be confidential and exclusive.
Contingency search is paid only on placement, and is uncommon at genuine C-suite level — the firm has no incentive to invest deeply in research, and the search cannot be exclusive.
Bands from publicly-cited industry conventions — the AESC Code of Professional Practice references retained fee structures, and 30–35% is the most widely-cited figure in trade reporting. Orientation, not a quote. No firm on this page publishes a fee schedule.
02 · the process
How a retained search actually runs.
Three phases, and the middle one is the widest — a market map of 100–250 names narrowing to a longlist of 20–40, then a shortlist of 4–6 the board will meet.
The placement guarantee, typically 12 months at the Big Five, covers a re-search at no additional fee if the placed executive leaves within the period.
It does not refund the fee.
Phase descriptions ported verbatim from this page's own explainer, "How a retained search actually runs".
Past this line — the firms, what they publish, and what they don't.
03 · the firms
The leading fractional executive search firms covering the UK
Editorial profiles. Numbers indicate position on this page — they are not a quantitative ranking. All facts below are taken from each firm's own official site, linked on every card.
Each firm's headline facts (founded, HQ, office and country count, practice areas) are taken from that firm's own official website only.
Anything a firm does not publish about itself is left as “Not stated on firm site” rather than filled in from third-party sources.
Fees are not publicly disclosed at the firm level by any of these firms. We show the industry band where publicly cited, and mark the per-firm cell as “Not publicly disclosed — quoted on brief.”
We profile the firms with the largest publicly-verifiable UK presence: the Big Five (SHREK) plus two UK- and federation-headquartered global firms (Odgers, Boyden). Other UK boutiques exist; we do not profile them here without primary-source data.
01 · Fractional platform
The publisher of this page. Listed first because it is ours, not because it outranks the firms below — and marked as such.
Fractional Quest
Best for: Fractional and interim executive placements, rapid deployment
Founded 2024. The UK's leading fractional executive platform, specialising in part-time C-suite appointments. Direct placement model with typical start times of 1-3 weeks versus 3-6 months for traditional retained search.
Publisher’s own platform. Fractional Quest is a fractional executive platform, not an executive search firm. We take no referral fees from any firm on this page, and none of them is a partner or client.
Every fact above is from the firm’s own site: fractional.quest/about. Anything the firm does not publish reads “Not stated on firm site” rather than being filled in.
02 · Big Five (SHREK)
Seventy years of board work, and one of the two most search-focused firms on this page.
Spencer Stuart
Best for: FTSE 100 / S&P 500 boards and CEO succession
Founded in 1956. The firm states it has 'more than 60 offices in over 30 countries' and describes itself on its own site as having 'over 70 years' experience in leadership consulting.'
Read the full Spencer Stuart review →Every fact above is from the firm’s own site: www.spencerstuart.com/who-we-are/firm-history. Anything the firm does not publish reads “Not stated on firm site” rather than being filled in.
03 · Big Five (SHREK)
The Big Five firm that also sells on-demand talent — the closest any of them come to the fractional model.
Heidrick & Struggles
Best for: PE-backed companies, CEO & board search, on-demand talent
Founded 1953 in Chicago. Describes itself on its own site as 'a premier provider of global leadership advisory and on-demand talent solutions.' The firm lists offices across 29 countries on its locations page.
No logo asset held for this firm — the slot ships empty rather than substituting a third-party image.
Read the full Heidrick & Struggles review →Every fact above is from the firm’s own site: www.heidrick.com/en/about-us. Anything the firm does not publish reads “Not stated on firm site” rather than being filled in.
04 · Big Five (SHREK)
The largest by revenue, and the least search-led — consulting is several business lines wide.
Korn Ferry
Best for: Full-service leadership consulting, large-scale transformation
Founded in Los Angeles in 1969 by Lester Korn and Richard Ferry. Describes itself on its own site as 'a global consulting firm that powers performance.' Korn Ferry does not publish an office or country count on its public About pages.
Read the full Korn Ferry review →Every fact above is from the firm’s own site: www.kornferry.com/about-us/our-story. Anything the firm does not publish reads “Not stated on firm site” rather than being filled in.
05 · Big Five (SHREK)
Madison Avenue, 1969. The financial-services and regulated-industry specialist of the five.
Russell Reynolds Associates
Best for: Financial services and regulated-industry board and C-suite
Founded 1969 on Madison Avenue, New York. The firm publishes 47 offices across 25 countries on its own site. States its purpose as 'to improve the way the world is led.'
Read the full Russell Reynolds Associates review →Every fact above is from the firm’s own site: www.russellreynolds.com/en/about/who-we-are/history. Anything the firm does not publish reads “Not stated on firm site” rather than being filled in.
06 · Big Five (SHREK)
One firm, all partners, and no founding year or HQ published anywhere on its own site.
Egon Zehnder
Best for: CEO and board succession with an 'all-partner', collaborative model
The firm publishes 71 offices in 37 countries on its locations page and describes its 'One Firm' partnership model. Egon Zehnder does not publish a founding year or HQ city on the About, Imprint, or Board pages on its own site (industry sources cite Zurich, 1964; we cite only what appears on the firm's own pages).
Read the full Egon Zehnder review →Every fact above is from the firm’s own site: www.egonzehnder.com/about-us. Anything the firm does not publish reads “Not stated on firm site” rather than being filled in.
07 · UK-headquartered
The only UK-headquartered firm here, and one of just two that state AESC membership on their own site.
Odgers (Odgers Berndtson)
Best for: UK plc and FTSE 250 boards, UK public sector leadership
The UK's largest home-grown executive search firm. The firm describes itself as having 'nearly 60 years' of history (no specific founding year published on its current About page) and operates 'across 33 countries.' Member of AESC (stated on its own site).
Read the full Odgers (Odgers Berndtson) review →Every fact above is from the firm’s own site: www.odgers.com/en-gb/about-odgers/. Anything the firm does not publish reads “Not stated on firm site” rather than being filled in.
08 · Global federation
A federation, not a headquarters — seventy-five offices and no single corporate centre.
Boyden
Best for: Industrial, healthcare and cross-border senior mandates
Founded in 1946 by Sidney Boyden. The firm states 'more than 75 offices in 45+ countries' on its own About page and presents itself as a partner-led global federation without naming a single corporate HQ city. Member of AESC and signatory to its Code of Professional Practice (stated on its own site).
Read the full Boyden review →Every fact above is from the firm’s own site: www.boyden.com/who-is-boyden/. Anything the firm does not publish reads “Not stated on firm site” rather than being filled in.
04 · fees
Executive search fees — the public picture.
None of the firms above publishes a fee schedule.
The bands below come from publicly-cited industry conventions: the AESC Code of Professional Practice references retained fee structures, and the 30–35% retained band is the most widely-cited figure in trade reporting.
Treat as orientation, not a quote — and always ask for a written fee letter.
Ported verbatim from the feeBenchmarks table in
lib/content/pages/executive-search-firms.ts. Industry body:
AESC.
05 · the standard
AESC, and what a guarantee actually covers.
The Association of Executive Search and Leadership Consultants, founded 1959 and headquartered in New York, is the industry's self-regulator.
Member firms commit to its Code of Professional Practice, covering confidentiality, candidate research methods and conflict-of-interest rules.
Two of the firms on this page — Odgers and Boyden — explicitly state AESC membership on their own websites; the others are widely cited as members but do not surface the claim on the About pages we reviewed.
The guarantee commits the firm to a re-search at no additional search fee if the placed executive leaves or is terminated within the window. It does not refund the fee.
AESC's own description of its role and standards: aesc.org/about-aesc · member directory.
Retained search is the right tool for one kind of question. This is the other kind.
The comparison
When a fractional or interim executive is the better answer than a retained search
A retained search is the right tool for permanent, multi-year, identity-defining appointments — a CEO succession, a public-company CFO, a FTSE board chair.
It is expensive (£60–£200k+ in fees on a £200–£600k role) and slow (3–6 months) because that depth and rigour is what the appointment requires.
It is the wrong tool for several other things that look similar from the outside.
If you need senior capability for a specific phase — a Series A founder building first finance discipline, an interim CFO bridging a fundraise, a turnaround chair for 12 months, a fractional CMO who runs marketing two days a week — a retained search is overkill on cost and timeline.
The same is true if you're not sure you need a full-time role at all and want to learn before committing.
Fractional and interim placements typically start within 1–3 weeks rather than 12–16, cost a fraction of a permanent first-year package (because there's no 30%+ search fee and no annualised full-time salary), and can convert to permanent if the fit is right. See our guide to top fractional executive search firms for firms specialising in part-time placements.
They don't replace executive search — they sit alongside it as the right answer to a different question.
Big Five executive search firms typically charge 30–35% of first-year compensation. Fractional executive search firms like Fractional Quest charge 10–15% of annual equivalent.
Traditional retained search takes 3–6 months from brief to placement. Fractional placements start within 1–3 weeks.
Most reputable search firms offer 6–12 month replacement guarantees. This covers re-search costs, not fee refunds.
The industry
What a fractional executive search firm actually is
A fractional executive search firm specialises in placing part-time senior executives, while traditional executive search firms focus on permanent full-time appointments.
Fractional search firms like Fractional Quest maintain candidate pools of experienced executives seeking flexible, part-time roles.
Traditional executive search firms — sometimes called "retained search firms" or "headhunters" — run structured processes to identify permanent candidates, with features including (1) upfront retainers, (2) exclusive engagements, and (3) proactive candidate approaches.
The industry self-regulator is the Association of Executive Search and Leadership Consultants (AESC), founded in 1959 and headquartered in New York.
AESC member firms commit to its Code of Professional Practice.
Two of the firms on this page (Odgers, Boyden) explicitly state AESC membership on their own websites; the others are widely cited as AESC members but do not surface the membership claim on the About pages we reviewed.
Retained vs engaged vs contingency search
Retained search is the standard model for C-suite and board appointments.
The firm is paid a retainer upfront (typically in three instalments — at engagement, at shortlist delivery, and at placement).
The fee is usually 30–35% of the placed candidate's first-year cash compensation for Big Five firms, and 25–33% for UK-headquartered firms and sector boutiques.
The retainer model exists because the firm invests heavily in research and assessment before any candidate signs an offer, and because the search must be confidential and exclusive.
Engaged or hybrid search combines a smaller upfront retainer with a success fee paid only on placement.
It is used by some mid-market and growth-stage firms where the client wants the rigour of a retained process but at lower commercial risk.
Contingency search is paid only on a successful placement.
It is uncommon at genuine C-suite level — the firm has no incentive to invest deeply in research, and the search cannot be exclusive (multiple firms are usually running the same brief in parallel).
Contingency works for functional senior hires below board level, where the candidate pool is wider and timelines are shorter.
How a retained search actually runs
Weeks 0–2 (briefing and research): The lead partner spends time with the chair, CEO, and any nomination committee to write the position specification — the role, the success measures, the compensation envelope, the constraints.
The research team builds a market map of every plausible candidate (typically 100–250 names), segmented by current role, sector, geography and risk-of-move.
Weeks 2–8 (longlist and approach): Researchers approach candidates discreetly, screen for interest and fit, and present a longlist (typically 20–40) to the client.
The partner then runs structured interviews and reference work to compress the longlist to a shortlist of 4–6 named candidates that the board will meet.
Weeks 8–16 (shortlist and offer): Board interviews, deeper referencing on the front-runners, psychometric or leadership assessment (firms vary), and offer negotiation.
The placement guarantee — typically 12 months at the Big Five — covers re-search at no additional fee if the placed executive leaves or is terminated within the guarantee period.
Method
How this guide is put together
Each firm's headline facts (founded, HQ, office and country count, practice areas) are taken from that firm's own official website only.
Anything a firm does not publish about itself is left as "Not stated on firm site" rather than filled in from third-party sources.
Fees are not publicly disclosed at the firm level by any of these firms. We show the industry band where it is publicly cited, and mark the per-firm cell as "Not publicly disclosed — quoted on brief."
We profile the firms with the largest publicly-verifiable UK presence: the Big Five (SHREK) plus two UK- and federation-headquartered global firms (Odgers, Boyden). Other UK boutiques exist; we do not profile them here without primary-source data.
Independence
Fractional Quest is a fractional executive platform, not an executive search firm.
We do not take referral fees from any firm listed below, and the firms listed are not partners or clients of Fractional Quest.
How this is maintained
Every per-firm claim is footnoted to the firm's own site.
If a firm changes its published office count, founding year, or practice areas, we update accordingly.
We do not maintain placement data on these firms and make no claim to.
Questions